Public emergencies such as civil wars, natural disasters, and economic crises test the theoretical and practical commitments of international human rights law. During national crises, international law permits states to suspend many human rights protections in order to safeguard national security. States frequently overstep the limits of this authority, violating even peremptory human rights such as the prohibitions against torture and prolonged arbitrary detention. In this volume, leading scholars from law, philosophy and political science grapple with challenging questions concerning the character, scope, and salience of international human rights, and they explain how the law seeks to protect human rights during emergencies. The contributors also evaluate the law's successes and failures and offer new proposals for strengthening respect for human rights.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Contributors
Acknowledgments
Evan J. Criddle, Introduction: Testing Human Rights Theory During Emergencies
PART I. DESIGNING A HUMAN RIGHTS REGIME FOR
EMERGENCIES
Gerald L. Neuman, Constrained Derogation in Positive Human Rights Regimes
Evan J. Criddle, Protecting Human Rights During Emergencies: Delegation, Derogation, and Deference
James W. Nickel, Two Models of Normative Frameworks for Human Rights During Emergencies
PART II. LAW, POLITICS, AND POWER
Emilie M. Hafner-Burton, Laurence R. Helfer, and Christopher J. Fariss, Emergency and Escape: Explaining Derogations from Human Rights Treaties
Fionnuala Ní Aoláin, The Cloak and Dagger Game of Derogation
Thomas Poole, The Law of Emergency and Reason of State
William E. Scheuerman, Human Rights Lawyers v. Carl Schmitt
PART III. EMERGING CHALLENGES
Scott Sheeran, Human Rights and Derogation in Peacekeeping: Addressing a Legal Vacuum Within the State of Exception
Diane A. Desierto, Austerity Measures and International Economic, Social, and Cultural RightsIndex
Aucun commentaire :
Enregistrer un commentaire