Tomas HAMILTON
Despite the establishment of UN embargoes, the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), and the EU Common Position, arms export regulation suffers from significant legal and practical limitations. This book critically evaluates the existing body of 'Arms Trade Law', highlighting its inadequacies in preventing weapons from reaching perpetrators of mass violence.
Through detailed examination of the arms trade's complexities, The Arms Trade and International Criminal Law foregrounds the structural causes of atrocity and argues for broader accountability. It investigates how individuals-including corporate executives, state officials, and arms traffickers-can be held directly accountable for atrocities under international law, even when their actions are geographically or causally distant from the violence itself. Furthermore, by advancing a specific interpretation of the actus reus and mens rea elements of accomplice liability under Article 25 of the Rome Statute, this book argues for a robust legal basis upon which the ICC can prosecute arms traders. It therefore underscores how international criminal law can complement existing regulations by leveraging its expressive function to condemn all those who profit from atrocity.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright Page
Foreword
Series Editors’ Preface
Acknowledgements
Table of Cases
Table of Primary Sources
Abbreviations
1. Introduction
1.1 Introduction2. Complementing Export Regulation with Criminal Accountability
1.2 Arms Traders as Accomplices
1.3 Unpacking the Global Arms Trade: Items, Actors, Conduct
1.4 The Arms Trade in International Criminal Law Scholarship
1.5 Overview of This Book
2.1 Introduction3. 'Arms Trade Law' and the Potential of International Justice
2.2 National Arms Export Regulations
2.3 International Agreements on the Arms Trade
2.4 Conclusion
3.1 Introduction4. The Actus Reus of a Complicit Arms Transfer
3.2 Arms Embargoes
3.3 The Plurality of ‘Arms Trade Law’
3.4 A Potential Role for International Criminal Law?
3.5 Conclusion
4.1 Introduction5. The Mens Rea of a Complicit Arms Transfer
4.2 Complicit Assistance in the Rome Statute
4.3 Preliminary Remarks on Interpretation
4.4 The Quiet Primacy of Article 25(3)(d)(ii) of the Rome Statute
4.5 Basic Requirements of Article 25(3)(d)(ii)
4.6 ‘Significant’ Arms Transfers (Degree of Contribution)
4.7 Causal Relationship with the Arms Transfer
4.8 Remoteness as a Useful Juridical Concept
4.9 The Significance of a Particular Shipment
4.10 Transferring Arms from Outside the Group of Perpetrators
4.11 Conclusion
5.1 Introduction6. Observing ICC Legal Culture on the Arms Trade
5.2 Article 25(3)(c) Aiding or Abetting
5.3 Contributing to a Group Crime under Article 25(3)(d)
5.4 Specificity of Knowledge: ‘Essential Matters’
5.5 Sources of Knowledge: Awareness of a UN Embargo or Fact-Finding
5.6 Degree of Knowledge: ‘Occurrence in the Ordinary Course of Events’
5.7 Aligning with Arms Trade Law: A Risk-based Approach
5.8 Appropriate Labelling of Arms Transfer Complicity
5.9 Conclusion
6.1 Introduction7. Imagining the Arms Trade in ICC Case Selection
6.2 The Concept of ‘Legal Culture’
6.3 Frame 1: Obscuring the Arms Trade through an Arms Trade Law Lens
6.4 Frame 2: Excluding the Arms Trade Due to Pragmatic Constraints
6.5 Conclusion
7.1 Introduction8. Investigating the Arms Trade in the Second Congo War
7.2 The Indeterminacy of Rules on ICC Case Selection
7.3 Legalism in ICC Case Selection
7.4 Conclusion
8.1 Introduction9. Overlooking Arms Brokers in the ICC's Situation in the DRC
8.2 A Case Study of the Second Congo War
8.3 Analysing Arms Flows in the Second Congo War
8.4 Arms Export Regulation During the Second Congo War
8.5 Arms Embargoes During the Second Congo War
8.6 Politicization Critiques of Arms Embargoes
8.7 The Panel of Experts: Resource Extraction and Arms Trafficking
8.8 Conclusion
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Recognizing Potential Arms Trade Cases in the DRC Situation
9.3 Blind Spot 1: Politically Viable Arms Trade Cases
9.4 Blind Spot 2: Pragmatic Arms Trade Prosecutions
9.5 Blind Spot 3: Imagined Victims, Imagined Perpetrators
9.6 Blind Spot 4: Horizontal Selectivity
9.7 Conclusion
10. Conclusion
Bibliography
Index
Tomas HAMILTON, Cover The Arms Trade and International Criminal Law. Reframing Accountability for Complicit Weapon Suppliers, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2025 (256 pp.)
Aucun commentaire :
Enregistrer un commentaire