Elisa MORGERA
Fair and equitable benefit-sharing is a diffuse legal phenomenon in international law. The continued proliferation of benefit-sharing clauses can be explained by their appeal as an optimistic frame in addressing sustainability and equity concerns related to bio-based innovation, the use of natural resources, environmental protection, and knowledge creation. In principle, fair and equitable benefit-sharing serves to recognize, encourage, and incentivise sustainable human relationships with the environment by focusing on equity issues arising from the most intractable challenges of our time, such as loss of biodiversity, climate change, poverty, and global epidemics. Empirical evidence, however, indicates that, in practice, benefit-sharing rarely achieves its fairness and equity objectives, and ends up entrenching or worsening inequitable relationships with little to no benefit for the environment.
Instead of focusing on fair and equitable benefit-sharing in sub-specialist areas of international law in isolation, Elisa Morgera assesses the phenomenon from a general international law perspective and through comparison-across international environmental law, international human rights law, international health law, and the law of the sea. Strengthened by insights from local-level case studies in different regions and sectors, this book looks toward overcoming the limitations inherent in individual international regimes and addressing the shortcomings in benefit-sharing implementation. Morgera's topical and comprehensive analysis reveals opportunities to advance fairness and equity in benefit-sharing through a mutually supportive interpretation of international biodiversity law and international human rights law, as well as opportunities to contribute to future research in areas such as international health law, international law on outer space, and international economic law.
Fair and equitable benefit-sharing is a diffuse legal phenomenon in international law. The continued proliferation of benefit-sharing clauses can be explained by their appeal as an optimistic frame in addressing sustainability and equity concerns related to bio-based innovation, the use of natural resources, environmental protection, and knowledge creation. In principle, fair and equitable benefit-sharing serves to recognize, encourage, and incentivise sustainable human relationships with the environment by focusing on equity issues arising from the most intractable challenges of our time, such as loss of biodiversity, climate change, poverty, and global epidemics. Empirical evidence, however, indicates that, in practice, benefit-sharing rarely achieves its fairness and equity objectives, and ends up entrenching or worsening inequitable relationships with little to no benefit for the environment.
Instead of focusing on fair and equitable benefit-sharing in sub-specialist areas of international law in isolation, Elisa Morgera assesses the phenomenon from a general international law perspective and through comparison-across international environmental law, international human rights law, international health law, and the law of the sea. Strengthened by insights from local-level case studies in different regions and sectors, this book looks toward overcoming the limitations inherent in individual international regimes and addressing the shortcomings in benefit-sharing implementation. Morgera's topical and comprehensive analysis reveals opportunities to advance fairness and equity in benefit-sharing through a mutually supportive interpretation of international biodiversity law and international human rights law, as well as opportunities to contribute to future research in areas such as international health law, international law on outer space, and international economic law.
Contents
Table of Cases
Table of Treaties and International Materials
List of Abbreviations
AN INTERNATIONAL LAW PHENOMENON
1. Introduction
2. An Initial Overview of the Emergence of Fair and Equitable Benefit- Sharing in International Law
2. An Initial Overview of the Emergence of Fair and Equitable Benefit- Sharing in International Law
2.1 When Did Fair and Equitable Benefit- Sharing Emerge in International Law?3. What is Fair and Equitable Benefit- Sharing?
2.2 Some Preliminary Distinctions
2.3 Why Has Fair and Equitable Benefit- Sharing Emerged in International Law?
3.1 Sharing4. Aims and Approach to the Study of Fair and Equitable Benefit- Sharing
3.2 Fairness and Equity
3.3 Benefits
3.4 Beneficiaries
4.1 Mutually Supportive Interpretation of International Biodiversity and Human Rights Law5. Structure of this Book
4.2 Incompletely Theorized Agreements
4.3 Global Law
4.4 Equity and Environmental Justice
1. INTER- STATE BENEFIT- SHARING
FROM ACCESS TO GENETIC RESOURCES
1. Introduction
2. Justice Dimensions and the Need for International Cooperation on Genetic Resources
3. Nagoya Protocol
2. Justice Dimensions and the Need for International Cooperation on Genetic Resources
3. Nagoya Protocol
3.1 Justice Dimensions from an International Law Perspective4. Differences and Common Challenges in Other ABS Regimes
3.2 Missing the Contextual Justice Dimension?
3.3 Benefit- Sharing as Equity Infra Legem
3.4 Benefit- Sharing as Equity Praeter Legem
3.5 Benefit- Sharing as Equity Contra Legem
4.1 International Plant Treaty5. Digital Sequence Information
4.2 Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework
4.3 BBNJ Agreement
4.4 Preliminary Considerations on Multilateral Benefit- Sharing
5.1 Justice Dimensions of DSI6. Conclusions: Iterative Learning and Regime Interaction
5.2 Reconsidering a Multilateral Approach under the CBD
5.3 Taking the Issue from the Side under the International Plant Treaty
5.4 Specifically Including DSI in the Scope of the BBNJ Agreement
2. INTER- STATE BENEFIT- SHARING AS SCIENTIFIC
AND TECHNOLOGICAL COOPERATION
1. Introduction
2. The Human Right to Science
6. Conclusions
2. The Human Right to Science
2.1 Information Sharing and Scientific Cooperation as Benefit- Sharing3. The Law of the Sea
2.2 Technology Transfer as Benefit- Sharing
3.1 The Duty to Cooperate4. BBNJ Agreement
3.2 Multilateral Information Sharing
3.3 Scientific Cooperation for Environmental Protection
4.1 Why is Ocean Knowledge Co- production Central to the BBNJ Agreement?5. Another Example: The International Climate Change Regime
4.2 The Advances of the BBNJ Agreement
4.3 BBNJ Institutions
4.4 Relevance of the Other Provisions in the BBNJ Agreement
6. Conclusions
3. INTRA- STATE BENEFIT- SHARING: STATE OBLIGATIONS
TOWARDS INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
1. Introduction
2. Indigenous Peoples’ Territories and Natural Resources
3. The Extent of Cross- Fertilization
3.1 The Perspective of International Human Rights Law4. Consolidating a Mutually Supportive Interpretation of Fair and Equitable Benefit- Sharing
3.2 Incompletely Theorized Aspects and Contributions under International Human Rights Law
3.3 The Perspective of International Biodiversity Law
5. Further Advancing a Mutually Supportive Interpretation of Fair and Equitable Benefit- Sharing
5.1 Procedural Dimensions6. Moving from Safeguarding to Fully Realizing Indigenous Peoples’ Human Rights through Benefit- Sharing
5.2 Substantive Dimensions
5.3 Benefit- Sharing and Impact Assessment
5.4 Benefit- Sharing and Free Prior Informed Consent
5.5 Benefit- Sharing and Compensation
7. Conclusions
4. INTRA- STATE AND TRANSNATIONAL BENEFIT- SHARING
WITH LOCAL KNOWLEDGE HOLDERS
1. Introduction
2. Intra- State Benefit- Sharing: Local Communities, Peasants, and Small- Scale Fishers
4. Transnational Benefit- Sharing from the Use of Traditional Knowledge
2. Intra- State Benefit- Sharing: Local Communities, Peasants, and Small- Scale Fishers
2.1 Beneficiaries and Justice Dimensions3. Intra- Community Benefit- Sharing and Women’s Human Rights
2.2 Security of Tenure
2.3 Comparative Reflections on Benefit- Sharing
4. Transnational Benefit- Sharing from the Use of Traditional Knowledge
4.1 Land- Based Knowledge5. Fair and Equitable Benefit- Sharing with Local Knowledge Holders for Transformative Change
4.2 Small- Scale Fishers’ Knowledge
4.3 Indigenous and Local Knowledge in Bio- Based Innovation
4.4 Indigenous and Local Knowledge at the International Science- Policy Interface
5. TRANSNATIONAL DIMENSIONS OF INTRA- STATE BENEFIT- SHARING:
BUSINESS RESPONSIBILITY TO RESPECT INDIGENOUS PEOPLES’ HUMAN RIGHTS
1. Introduction
2. Business Due Diligence and International Law
3. UN Framework and Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
5. The OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises
2. Business Due Diligence and International Law
3. UN Framework and Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights
3.1 Business Responsibility to Respect Indigenous Peoples’Human Rights4. UN Global Compact
3.2 Practice of the UN Special Rapporteur on Indigenous Peoples’ Rights
5. The OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises
5.1 Business Responsibility to Respect Indigenous Peoples’Human Rights6. The Performance Standards of the International Finance Corporation
5.2 Operationalization
6.1 Introduction to the IFC and its Performance Standards7. Business- Community Agreements
6.2 Business Responsibility to Respect Indigenous Peoples’Human Rights
6.3 Operationalization
8. CONCLUSIONS
Conclusions
Index
1. IntroductionSelected Bibliography
2. Key Findings
3. Legal Status
4. Research Agenda
Index
Aucun commentaire :
Enregistrer un commentaire