The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty became binding international law in late 2014, and although the text of the treaty is a relatively concise framework for assessing whether to authorize or deny proposed conventional weapons transfers by States Parties, there exists controversy as to the meaning of certain key provisions. Furthermore, the treaty requires a national regulatory body to authorize proposed transfers of conventional weapons covered by the treaty, but does not detail how such a body should be established and how it should effectively function.
MULTIPOL - Réseau d'analyse et d'information sur l'actualité internationale (http://reseau-multipol.blogspot.com)
Article épinglé
INFOS
Multipol est un réseau international et interdisciplinaire de chercheurs et d’experts en droit international et relations internationales , ...
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Gilles GIACCA. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est Gilles GIACCA. Afficher tous les articles
28 mars 2017
OUVRAGE : S. Casey-Maslen, A. Clapham, G. Giacca, S. Parker, The Arms Trade Treaty: A Commentary
Stuart CASEY-MASLEN, Andrew CLAPHAM, Gilles GIACCA, Sarah PARKER
Libellés :
Andrew CLAPHAM
,
Gilles GIACCA
,
Sarah PARKER
,
Sécurité internationale/Défense
,
Stuart CASEY-MASLEN
18 octobre 2016
OUVRAGE : A. Clapham, S. Casey-Maslen, G. Giacca, S. Parker, The Arms Trade Treaty: A Commentary
Andrew CLAPHAM, Stuart CASEY-MASLEN, Gilles GIACCA, Sarah PARKER
The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty became binding international law in late 2014, and although the text of the treaty is a relatively concise framework for assessing whether to authorize or deny proposed conventional weapons transfers by States Parties, there exists controversy as to the meaning of certain key provisions. Furthermore, the treaty requires a national regulatory body to authorize proposed transfers of conventional weapons covered by the treaty, but does not detail how such a body should be established and how it should effectively function.
The United Nations Arms Trade Treaty became binding international law in late 2014, and although the text of the treaty is a relatively concise framework for assessing whether to authorize or deny proposed conventional weapons transfers by States Parties, there exists controversy as to the meaning of certain key provisions. Furthermore, the treaty requires a national regulatory body to authorize proposed transfers of conventional weapons covered by the treaty, but does not detail how such a body should be established and how it should effectively function.
Libellés :
Andrew CLAPHAM
,
Gilles GIACCA
,
Sarah PARKER
,
Sécurité internationale/Défense
,
Stuart CASEY-MASLEN
Inscription à :
Articles
(
Atom
)