Dino KRITSIOTIS, Olivier CORTEN, Gregory H. FOX
In the past decade, numerous military operations by outside states have relied on the real or alleged 'invitation' of one of the parties. In this book, three experts examine the relevant legal issues, from sovereignty to the scope and relevance of consent, the use of force to the role of the Security of Council. Using critical historical analysis, qualitative case studies and large-N empirics, these topics are debated and addressed in a unique trialogue format. Accommodating the pluralism of the field, the trialogical setting highlights the divergences and commonalities of each of the three approaches.
Benefiting from an in-depth analysis of recent cases of armed intervention and the diversity of the authors' perspectives, this collection is key to developing a richer understanding of the law of military intervention. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
Anne Peters and Christian Marxsen
Introduction
Anne Peters, Principle and Practice of Armed Intervention and Consent
I. Recent Events and Possible Shifts of the Law
II. Some Key Issues of Legal Concern
A. The Power to Consent Revisited
B. Legal Limits on the Intervener
C. The Combination of Legal Grounds for Intervention and the Involvement of the UN Security Council
III. The Trialogue Method
IV. An Overview of the Book
V. In Lieu of Conclusions: Principle and Practice Revisited
Chapter 1. Dino Kritsiotis, Intervention and the Problematisation of Consent
I. Introduction
II. Three Preliminary Matters
A. Force and Intervention: The Laws of the Ius ad BellumIII. Intervention, Coercion, and Force
B. The Third State
C. Method and the Nicaragua Case
A. Intervention and CoercionIV. The Limitations of Consent
B. Dictatorial Interference
C. Consent and Force
A. The Basis of AllowabilityV. The Function of Consent within the Ius ad Bellum
B. Resolutions of the Institut de droit international
C. Consent within Non-International Armed Conflicts
A. Collective Self-Defence
B. Counter-Intervention
C. Pro-Democratic Intervention
D. Authorisation from the UN Security Council
I. Conclusion
Chapter 2. Olivier Corten, Intervention by Invitation: The Expanding Role of the UN Security Council
I. Introduction
A. Legal Conditions: What Legal Effects Exist for the Right of Peoples to Self-Determination?II. Counter-Intervention: The Saudi-Led Intervention in Yemen
B. Aim and Methodology
A. The Existing Legal Framework: Counter-Intervention and Self-DeterminationIII. The Fight against International Terrorism: The War against ISIL in Iraq and Syria
B. Invocation of Counter-Intervention in the Yemeni Context
C. Problems Raised by the Invocation of Counter-Intervention in the Yemeni Context
D. The Decisive Role of the UN Security Council in the Yemeni Context
A. The Existing Legal Framework: Self-Determination and the Fight against International TerrorismIV. Repression of Secession? The French-Led Intervention in Mali
B. Invocation of the Fight against International Terrorism in the Iraqi and Syrian Context
C. Problems Raised by the Invocation of the Fight against International Terrorism in the Iraqi and Syrian Context
D. The Decisive Role of the UN Security Council in the Iraqi and Syrian Context
A. The Existing Legal Framework: Secession and Self-DeterminationV. Protection of Democracy? The ECOWAS Intervention in The Gambia
B. Was the Repression of Secession Invoked in the Malian Context?
C. Problems Raised by the Invocation of Intervention by Invitation in the Malian Context
D. The Decisive Role of the UN Security Council in the Malian Context
A. The Existing Legal Framework: Democracy and Self-DeterminationVI. The Expanding Role of the UN Security Council
B. Was the Protection of Democracy Invoked in the Gambian Context?
C. Problems Raised by the Invocation of Intervention by Invitation in the Gambian Context
D. The Decisive Role of the UN Security Council in the Gambian Context
A. Towards a Rationalisation of the Appraisal of the Right to Self-Determination of Peoples?
B. A Lawful Practice? What Legal Effects?
Chapter 3. Gregory H. Fox, Invitations to Intervene after the Cold War: Towards a New Collective Model
I. Introduction
II. The State of Debate
A. The Cold War SettingIII. Methodology for Assessing Recent State Practice
B. The Nicaragua View
C. The IDI View
D. The Democratic Legitimacy View
E. Anti-Terrorist Operations
A. Selecting Conflicts
B. Defining Civil Wars
IV. Post-Cold War Practice: An Overview
V. UN Security Council Views on the Prevalent Legal Theories
A. The Nicaragua ViewVI. A New Paradigm? The Multilateralisation of Consensual Interventions
B. The IDI View
C. The Democratic Legitimacy View
D. Anti-Terrorism
E. Conclusions
A. The Demise of Rules for a Polarised World
B. The Contribution of UN Security Council Practice
VII. Conclusions
Appendix I. Coding Manual
Appendix II. Cases of Intervention by Invitation, 1990–2017
Conclusion
Christian Marxsen, Half-Hearted Multilateralisation of a Unilateral Doctrine
I. Limitation: The State of Negative EqualityIndex
II. Institutionalisation: The Role of the UN Security Council
III. Legislation? The UN Security Council’s Contribution to Law making
IV. Politicisation: Increasing the Complexities
V. Multilateralisation and Its Limits
Aucun commentaire :
Enregistrer un commentaire