Trésor MUHINDO MAKUNYA
A rigorous and original comparative study of constitutional interpretation in Benin, the Democratic Republic of Congo and South Africa, this book explores how the Constitutional Courts of these countries shaped protection of fundamental rights across diverse legal traditions. While these jurisdictions employ similar interpretive methods, their judicial outcomes often diverge, shaped by distinct historical, political, and institutional contexts. Blending doctrinal analysis with bold normative insight, the work advocates for closer synergy between civil law and common law traditions to strengthen human rights protection in Africa.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Preface
Acknowledgments
About the author
Acronyms and abbreviations
PART I: COMPARATIVE FRAMEWORK
1 Legal traditions and constitutional interpretation in Africa: An introduction
1 Introduction
2 The centrality of legal traditions in Africa
3 Relevance of constitutional interpretation3.1 Situating the problem4 Contribution of the book
3.2 Lack of clear constitutional foundation(s)
3.3 Meaning, nature and purpose
3.4 Beyond positivism in interpreting fundamental rights
3.5 Canons of constitutional interpretation
5 Key concepts
6 Comparative constitutional law approaches
7 Summary of the book
2 Fundamental rights and constitutional courts in the Benin, Democratic Republic of Congo and South African Constitutions: Background and approaches
1 Introduction
2 Historical and political background of the three countries2.1 Authoritarianism and the violation of fundamental rights and freedoms3 Recognition and protection of fundamental rights and freedoms
2.2 The failure of judiciaries to check authoritarianism3.1 Scope of rights in bills of rights4 Constitutional courts’ human rights protection mandate
3.2 The ability of bills of rights to check arbitrary amendments
3.3 The relationship between bills of rights and international law
5 Conclusion
PART II: INTERPRETATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IN PRACTICE
3 Benin
1 Introduction
2 Methods of constitutional interpretation2.1 General interpretive methods3 The role of international law norms
2.2 Types of teleological or policy-oriented arguments
4 The interpretation of substantive rights4.1 The rights to equality and non-discrimination5 Limitation of fundamental rights
4.2 Political rights
4.3 The right to a fair trial (due process of law)
6 Conclusion
4 The Democratic Republic of Congo
1 Introduction
2 Interpretation of substantive jurisdiction and rules on admissibility2.1 Overview of cases under discussion3 The interpretation of substantive rights
2.2 Use of teleological and extra-legal arguments to expand the Court’s substantive jurisdiction
2.3 Use of textual and formalistic arguments to restrict access to the Court
2.4 Interpretation of actions in the interest of the public3.1 The rights to equality and non-discrimination4 Aids to constitutional interpretation used by the Constitutional Court
3.2 The rights to a fair trial and due process of law
3.3 Political rights4.1 International law as an aid to constitutional interpretation5 Interpretation of limitation to the Bill of Rights
4.2 The role of precedents in the Court’s interpretive practices
6 Conclusion
5 South Africa
1 Introduction
2 Pressures, competition and complementarity in bill-of-rights interpretation2.1 The multiplicity of judicial interpreters of the Bill of Rights3 The Constitutional Court’s methods of interpretation
2.2 Nature and quality of demand for bill-of-rights interpretation3.1 General interpretive methods4 Choice of methods of interpretation of substantive rights
3.2 A flexible approach to international law as an aid to interpretation
3.3 Precedent-based arguments or interpretation
3.4 The place and relevance of (South) African indigenous values4.1 The right to equality and non-discrimination5 Interpretation of limitations of rights
4.2 Fair trial and due process of law
4.3 Political rights
6 Conclusion
PART III: COMPARATIVE TRENDS AND LESSONS
6 Promoting a human rights culture through constitutional interpretation
1 Introduction
2 Convergences and divergences2.1 The use of similar methods of constitutional interpretation3 Factors influencing methods of constitutional interpretation
2.2 Categorising and explaining the meaning, content and relevance of constitutional rights
2.3 Quality of protection of fundamental rights through constitutional interpretation
2.4 Aids to interpretation and their impact on enhancing a human rights culture3.1 Factors related to differences between legal traditions4 Conclusion
3.2 Factors related to the Bill of Rights
7 Conclusion: Enhancing the human rights culture beyond legal traditions in Africa
1 Introduction
2 Strengthening the courts’ human rights protection mandate
3 Learning from the decentralised and centralised review models
4 Fostering value-oriented, context-sensitive approaches to access to constitutional jurisdictions
5 Liberalising constitutional courts’ approaches to international law
6 Fostering cross-systemic legal education in Africa
7 Reconceptualising the role of continental judicial engagements
8 Conclusion
Bibliography
List of instruments

Aucun commentaire :
Enregistrer un commentaire